ArticleCureus2025
Robotic Rectopexy: A Single-Centre Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Totally Extramucosal Hand-Sewn Robotic Gastrojejunostomy for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims Rectal prolapse and rectocele are socially and psychologically debilitating conditions. While laparoscopic rectopexy has improved outcomes over open surgery, it faces limitations in pelvic access, mesh positioning, and suturing. Robotic-assisted rectopexy may overcome these challenges through enhanced visualisation and manoeuvrability. This study presents a single-centre experience of robotic rectopexy. Methods A retrospective review was conducted at Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, UK, from 2019-2024. Data collected included operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, analgesia requirement and length of stay. Results Twenty-one patients underwent robotic rectopexy. The mean operative time was three hours and 18 minutes. No conversions or intraoperative complications were observed. All patients were managed with simple analgesia. Fifteen (71.4%) were discharged on post-operative day (POD) 1, four patients on POD 2 and two patients were discharged later (POD >3). The mean hospital stay was 1.6 days. Two patients had small postoperative collections managed conservatively. One recurrence was observed on follow-up. Conclusions Robotic rectopexy is a safe and effective technique for rectal prolapse, demonstrating minimal complications and short hospital stays. Further research is warranted to assess long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.