ArticleCureus2025
Understanding Barriers to Colon Cancer Screening Among Individuals Experiencing Housing Insecurity in Los Angeles.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer is a leading cause of death among unhoused people, and the limited prior studies on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in this group have shown low rates of screening compared to the general population.
methodsPhysicians administered surveys to patients at the University of California, Los Angeles Mobile Clinic who were experiencing homelessness or housing insecurity to determine rates of prior CRC screening, establish a baseline understanding of CRC screening, and elucidate barriers to screening. Physicians also administered a brief educational intervention about CRC screening and then administered a post-intervention survey to assess changes in participants' understanding and preferences related to CRC screening. Results: A total of 44 patients completed both the pre- and post-surveys and the educational intervention. Fewer than 50% of respondents aged 45 or older had a primary care provider (PCP) (n = 21) or had undergone CRC screening (n = 13). Patients who had health insurance - and particularly those who had a PCP - were more likely to have been offered and to have completed screening. CRC screening knowledge and self-efficacy increased after the brief educational intervention.
conclusionHelping unhoused patients obtain health insurance and establish care with a PCP may create opportunities to discuss preventive care and improve CRC screening rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.