ArticleCureus2025
Patient Attitudes About Light Therapy and Negative Ion Therapy for Nonseasonal Depression: An Online Survey Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNo studies have evaluated the feasibility of light therapy or negative ion therapy as maintenance treatments after acute antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder. To address this gap, we surveyed people with depression about their knowledge and attitudes about light therapy and negative ion therapy, and their willingness to participate in a clinical trial of maintenance treatment with these therapies.
methodsParticipants with a self-reported diagnosis of depression completed a researcher-generated online survey, created for this study, examining awareness and effectiveness of light therapy and negative ion therapy, which included vignettes describing the use of these therapies for maintenance treatment. Participants were asked about the feasibility and reasons for wanting (and not wanting) to use the therapies instead of antidepressants. Response frequencies were compared using chi-square tests.
resultsA total of 193 participants completed the survey. Most were aware of both therapies, but significantly more participants had heard of light therapy (95% versus 63% for negative ion therapy, p<0.001), had used light therapy (29% versus 17%, p<0.001), and regarded light therapy as effective (54% versus 37%, p<0.001). Both therapies were considered easy to use. Most participants (81%) placed importance on finding non-medication therapies for maintenance treatment; 77% responded that they would likely volunteer for a randomized study of maintenance treatment.
conclusionPeople with depression are aware of light therapy and negative ion therapy and support their usage as substitutes for antidepressants in maintenance treatment. This supports the importance and feasibility of a randomized relapse prevention trial with light therapy and negative ion therapy in people with depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.