Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487847›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Brushing Simulation on the Surface Roughness of Acrylic- and Silicone-Based Soft Liners Using Two Different Commercially Available Denture Cleansers: An In Vitro Study.

Vishakha Sachani, Jyoti B Parihar, Akshita Chipper, Reema Srichand, Swapnali Mhatre, Mridula Joshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vishakha SachaniProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge and Implantology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Jyoti B PariharProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge and Implantology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Akshita ChipperProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge and Implantology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Reema SrichandProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge and Implantology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Swapnali MhatreProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge and Implantology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Mridula JoshiProsthodontics and Crown and Bridge and Implantology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This present in vitro study evaluates the impact of brushing simulation on the surface roughness of acrylic-based and silicone-based soft denture liners following immersion in two different denture cleansing solutions. Materials and methods Specimens of silicone-based and acrylic-based soft liners were fabricated and subjected to a standardized brushing simulation protocol. Soft liners were suspended into the standard template of 40 mm x 15 mm x 10 mm dimensions. Two denture cleansers were employed during simulated brushing. The first group was brushed with Stim Clanden denture cleanser, and the second group with Clinsodent denture cleaning powder. Surface roughness (Ra and Rz values) was recorded before and after the simulation using a profilometer. Data were statistically evaluated using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests to determine significant differences. Results A statistically marked increase in surface roughness was noted in both liner types after brushing simulation. Silicone-based liners exhibited comparatively better resistance to surface deterioration than acrylic-based liners. Conclusion Brushing simulation with denture cleansers impacts the surface roughness of soft liners, with acrylic-based liners being more susceptible to surface damage. Silicon-based soft liners proved to be effective and more resistant to surface damage.

Indexed as

acrylic linerbrushing simulationdenture cleanserpresent in vitro studysilicone linersoft denture linerssurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID41487847
PMCPMC12760128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.