ArticleCureus2025
Manometric Evaluation of Esophageal Motility in Patients With Non-cardiac Chest Pain: A Retrospective Study From a Tertiary Center in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is a frequent clinical problem that often mandates intensive investigations for the exclusion of cardiac etiology. Esophageal motility disorders are a leading cause of NCCP; however, data from the Middle East are lacking. This was a retrospective study of 41 male patients (n=41; 100%) aged 23-57 years, who were referred to a tertiary care institution in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, with NCCP. All patients had high-resolution manometry (HRM), upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and laboratory testing. HRM showed ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) as the most common abnormality in 12 patients (n=12; 30%), followed by distal esophageal spasm (DES) in five patients (n=5; 12.5%), while achalasia and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow obstruction were infrequent. Importantly, 18 patients (n=18; 45%) with routine endoscopy had abnormal HRM patterns, reflecting the shortcomings of endoscopy alone. We did not find a significant correlation between endoscopic and HRM findings. These findings support the importance of including HRM in NCCP diagnostic algorithms to enhance accuracy and inform personalized, patient-centered management in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.