ArticleCureus2025
A Study on the Efficacy of Drug-Mediated Moist Wound Healing Combined With Phototherapy in the Management of Facial Abrasion Scars.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of drug-mediated moist wound healing combined with phototherapy in the treatment of facial abrasion scars, with a focus on improving both clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Methods A total of 40 patients with facial abrasion scars were randomly assigned to two groups: the saline and iodophor solution group (control group) and the combined treatment group (receiving both drug-moist wound healing and photoelectric therapy). Wound healing time, scar appearance, and patient-reported outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results The results showed that the combined treatment group demonstrated significant advantages in promoting wound healing (t = 2.65; P < 0.05), improving scar appearance (t = 4.59, 7.48; P < 0.05), and enhancing patient satisfaction (t = 4.07, 6.87, 4.43; P < 0.05) compared to the control group. Conclusion These findings suggest that the combination of drug-moist wound healing and photoelectric therapy is a promising therapeutic approach for the management of facial abrasion scars. It can significantly shorten the wound healing time, improve scar appearance, and enhance patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.