Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487825›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Characterization of Current Utilization of Machine Perfusion and Living-Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Elana Taute, Nina L Eng, Sean P Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elana TauteDepartment of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Nina L EngDepartment of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Sean P MartinDepartment of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have experienced a decreased rate of deceased-donor transplants. We aimed to examine differences between two alternative approaches: living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and machine perfusion (MP). METHODOLOGY: Using national data, we identified 935 patients who underwent liver transplantation for a primary diagnosis of HCC between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023, using either MP or LDLT.

resultsA total of 537 patients were transplanted using MP compared with 398 with LDLT. Throughout the study period, patients transplanted using MP were more likely to be older (odds ratio (OR) 1.03,

conclusionsIncreased competition for organs after the implementation of acuity circle allocation has resulted in decreased rates of transplantation for HCC. LDLT has been one solution to increase access and remains a viable option for some patients. Conversely, MP may help centers offer organs to patients who are non-ideal living donor candidates without concern for worse outcomes.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomeliver transplantationliving donor liver transplantationmachine perfusiontransplant waitlist

Identifiers

PMID41487825
PMCPMC12757974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.