Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487807›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Psychological Factors Influencing Pain Perception and Experience in Women Undergoing Mammography: A Systematic Review.

Irene Neophytou, George Charalampous, Eleni Jelastopulu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irene NeophytouDepartment of Nursing, Frederick University, Nicosia, CYP.
George CharalampousDepartment of Surgery, Frederick University, Nicosia, CYP.
Eleni JelastopuluDepartment of Public Health, University of Patras, Patras, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain during mammography is a common experience among women and has been identified as a potential barrier to adherence to breast cancer screening programs. While technical and biological factors contribute to pain, emerging evidence suggests that psychological factors may significantly influence pain perception and experience during mammography. This systematic review, therefore, aims to examine the association between psychological factors and the experience of pain during mammography, as well as the intensity of pain experienced during mammography, as measured through validated pain scales or self-reported questionnaires. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines were used to conduct the systematic review. The electronic databases PubMed and Scopus were used to systematically search for published articles. Keywords used included (mammograph* OR "screening mammograph*" OR mammogram* OR "breast cancer screening" OR "mammographic screening") AND ("psychological factor*" OR anxiety OR stress OR fear OR "fear of pain" OR pain OR catastrophizing OR "pain catastrophization" OR depression OR "coping strateg*" OR neuroticism OR extraversion) AND (pain OR soreness OR tenderness). Eligibility criteria, including study population, outcome/exposure of interest, study type, language, and publication status, were used to identify relevant literature that measured the association between psychological factors and pain experience. This was a systematic review of publications without year limitations. We found 2,761 articles; 743 were excluded due to duplication. Of the remaining 2,018 studies, 11 were included. Anxiety, pain expectations, previous mammography experience, and nervousness were the most consistently associated psychological factors with increased pain perception during mammography. Coping-related psychological factors showed a consistent pattern: catastrophizing was linked to higher pain intensity, whereas adaptive strategies such as ignoring pain or increasing behavioral activity were associated with less pain. Additionally, higher coping efficacy provided a protective effect on the pain experience. The relationship between depression and pain was inconsistent, and findings regarding personality traits and fear of pain were inconclusive. Pain during mammography was found to be highly prevalent, ranging from 6% to 93% across studies, with moderate to severe pain reported in a substantial proportion of participants. Psychological factors play a significant role in shaping women's perception and experience of pain during mammography. Anxiety, pain expectations, prior painful experiences, and maladaptive coping strategies such as catastrophizing were associated with higher pain intensity, whereas coping efficacy and adaptive strategies appeared protective. Recognizing these psychological influences is important for understanding differences in women's mammography pain experiences.

Indexed as

anxietybreast cancer screeningdepressionfear of painpainpain catastrophizingpsychological factorsscreening mammography

Identifiers

PMID41487807
PMCPMC12757431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.