ArticleCureus2025
Opioid Prescribing Behavior in Emergency Settings and Associated Risk Factors in the Central Region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPain management is an important issue in emergency medicine. Although opioids have many associated adverse effects, including opioid misuse and dependence, they are still frequently prescribed nowadays. Subsequently, it is vital to understand the factors influencing opioid prescribing decisions among emergency physicians. This article aims to examine factors affecting opioid prescribing behaviors among emergency physicians in Saudi Arabia and assess attitudes impacting prescribing practices.
methodsA cross-sectional study was performed in the period from February 2024 to February 2025 among 213 emergency physicians in Saudi Arabia. The clinical, external, and psychosocial factors affecting opioid prescribing decisions were evaluated using a 22-item Likert-scale questionnaire. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable regression analyses were used to explore the relationship of demographic, regional, and professional data with predictors of prescribing behaviors.
resultsOur study included 213 emergency physicians, with the majority (62.4%, n=133) aged between 23 and 30 years. While 72.8% (n=155) of participants were male, female physicians represented 27.2% (n=58) of the sample. The analysis revealed that younger physicians, as well as people with one to two years of experience after post-graduation, had a higher opioid prescribing score (OPS). Prior analgesic use, pain severity, and physical examination findings were the most common clinical factors. No significant associations were found for age, gender, practice level, or region. Male physicians showed slightly higher OPS than female physicians (B = 2.53, p = .167, 95%CI -1.07, 6.13). However, the association was not statistically significant. Physicians working more than 16 shifts per month also demonstrated a non-significant trend toward higher OPS compared to those with 12 or fewer shifts (B = 4.91, p = .086, 95%CI -0.71, 10.53). In contrast, fewer years since graduation significantly predicted higher OPS (β = -7.81, p = 0.029) in the multivariable regression. Additionally, gender, practice level, or region revealed no significant differences.
conclusionEmergency physicians with fewer years of experience and younger ages are more willing to prescribe opioids mainly directed by clinical causes in Saudi Arabia. These findings call for more focused educational interventions and standardized guidelines in order to promote safe opioid use and reduce potential overprescribing behavior within society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.