Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487771›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Medical Students' Predictions as to How Medical Practice Will Evolve by the Year 2050.

Sheema Chaudhry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sheema ChaudhryInternal Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Medicine is a field that is continually evolving, and sociopolitical events, medical advances, and challenges have contributed to the development of medicine over time and will continue to impact the future. There is current literature relating to the future of medicine focusing on technology, medical education, and the changing role of doctors. Aims This study aims to explore medical students' perceptions of how medical practice may be in the year 2050 and to utilize this information to guide potential changes that could be made to the medical school curriculum in order to best prepare students for these changes. Methods General qualitative methodology with a constructivist and interpretivist standpoint was used to conduct semi-structured focus groups using medical students at the University of Nottingham. The data were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Seven key themes were derived from the data: Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (AI), Technology, Genomics, The Future of the National Health Service (NHS), Epidemiological Uncertainty, The Changing Role of a Doctor, and Thoughts on How to Prepare for the Future. Conclusion The seven themes derived from the data represent the students' thoughts on how medical practice will change by the year 2050 when they are practicing. This can be organized again into sociopolitical events, medical advances, and challenges to provide a broad image of how medicine may be and thus how medical students can be prepared in medical school for their careers.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefocus group interviewsfourth-year medical studentsfuture careermedical education curriculum

Identifiers

PMID41487771
PMCPMC12757654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.