ReviewCureus2025
Mapping the Comparative Effectiveness of Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy, Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Training, and Mirror Therapy for Upper Extremity Rehabilitation in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemiplegic cerebral palsy (CP) usually impacts upper extremity function, leading to reduced participation and independence. Evidence-based treatment approaches such as modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT), hand-arm bimanual intensive training (HABIT), and mirror therapy have demonstrated neuroplasticity; however, direct comparisons among these interventions remain limited. Hence, this scoping review addresses evidence on the comparative efficacy, safety, and outcomes of these interventions in children with hemiplegic CP, mainly for the upper limb function. A literature search was performed in ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar with specified keywords from January 2020 to September 2025. From 4,391 records, 14 high-quality studies rated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were included. The findings reported that all the interventions improved bimanual performance, upper limb motor control, and participation, with no adverse effects and short-term gains. mCIMT showed better unimanual outcomes; HABIT approach demonstrated superiority in bimanual coordination; mirror therapy enhanced dexterity/spasticity, especially as an adjunct. Comparative trials were absent, with heterogeneous protocols limiting rankings. Hence, mCIMT, HABIT, and mirror therapy offer safe, effective options for upper extremity rehabilitation in hemiplegic CP, supporting personalized/hybrid approaches. Future multicenter RCTs with standardized dosing and long-term follow-ups are needed to address gaps in comparisons and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.