ArticleCureus2025
Enhancing Clinical Practice in Adult Airway Suctioning: A Two-Cycle Audit at Aswan University Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndotracheal suctioning (ETS) is a critical intervention for mechanically ventilated adult patients in intensive care units (ICUs), but improper technique can lead to significant complications. Adherence to established ETS guidelines is essential for patient safety and optimal outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess and improve healthcare professionals' adherence to adult airway suctioning guidelines at Aswan University Hospital through a two-cycle clinical audit and targeted educational intervention.
methodsA cross-sectional audit was conducted in the ICU, Emergency Department, and Short Stay Rooms at Aswan University Hospital. In the first cycle, 103 healthcare workers were evaluated for adherence to ETS protocols using a standardized questionnaire. Root causes of non-compliance were identified, followed by an educational intervention including didactic sessions, hands-on training, and protocol reinforcement. The second cycle involved 125 participants and reassessed adherence post-intervention.
resultsThe educational intervention led to notable improvements in guideline adherence. Recognition of suctioning indications improved from 24 (23%) in the first cycle to 91 (72.8%) in the second. Performance of post-suctioning procedures rose from 21 (20%) to 100 (80%). Awareness of special considerations increased from 26 (25%) to 94 (75%). Moderate gains were also seen in suction duration, catheter selection, and complication awareness. However, documentation and equipment selection showed only modest improvement or minor decline, indicating the need for continued education.
conclusionTargeted education and protocol reinforcement significantly improved most aspects of airway suctioning practice among healthcare workers. Sustained improvements require ongoing training, regular audits, and a focus on practical skills, particularly in documentation and equipment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.