ReviewCureus2025
Liver Biopsy During Pregnancy: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing liver pathology, yet its application during pregnancy is limited due to concerns for maternal and fetal safety. While percutaneous, image-guided techniques are generally safe, the risk of complications, though low, has led most providers to defer biopsy until postpartum. Nevertheless, timely evaluation of liver disease in pregnancy is crucial, given its potential impact on both maternal and fetal outcomes. This review examines the indications, outcomes, and safety of liver biopsy during pregnancy. Pregnancy-related liver disease presents unique diagnostic challenges. Conditions such as acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count) syndrome, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), and hepatic masses may warrant biopsy in select cases. Although diagnostic tools such as the Swansea criteria reduce the need for biopsy in AFLP, histological confirmation may be essential when non-invasive methods are inconclusive. In rare cases of hepatocellular carcinoma or suspected graft rejection post-liver transplant, biopsy may provide indispensable diagnostic clarity. However, evidence regarding its safety remains sparse. Overall, liver biopsy during pregnancy is rarely indicated but can be pivotal when non-invasive tests fail to establish a diagnosis. Current guidelines recommend a stepwise approach, prioritizing non-invasive modalities before proceeding to biopsy. Further prospective studies are needed to better define the safety profile and diagnostic yield of liver biopsy in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.