ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026
Healthcare providers' perspectives on collaboration of care for acute cystitis in women and the role of the community pharmacy: A qualitative study.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute cystitis (AC) is generally treated in primary care by general practitioners. Support from the community pharmacy may relieve the GP's workload and increase accessibility of care for women. Aim: To explore healthcare providers' (HCPs') perspectives on the collaboration of care for AC and investigate their views on possibilities for task shifting towards community pharmacy. Method: This qualitative study was conducted within the setting of pharmacotherapy audit meetings (PTAMs) involving general practitioners and community pharmacists. Focus group discussions were embedded in PTAMs to gain insight into participants' perspectives on the organization of care for AC and the potential role of the community pharmacies. Additionally, individual interviews were carried out with a subset of PTAM participants and other primary care professionals (e.g. assistants). Focus groups and interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Results: Five focus groups and 12 interviews were conducted; in total 57 participants were included (45 of them were working in general practice). Although HCPs were experienced in providing AC care, they reported some shortcomings in the current care process. They perceived limited advantages in shifting tasks to community pharmacies. Key barriers included time constraints within pharmacies and insufficient access to patients' medical histories. Expanding the role of community pharmacies could be supported through financial compensation for counseling, adequate training of pharmacy personnel, and strong collaboration between pharmacists and general practitioners. Conclusion: Although there is room for improvement in the organization of care for AC, participants saw limited opportunities for task shifting towards community pharmacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.