ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Deep recurrent models for forecasting infectious diseases.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting influenza in the post-COVID era: assessing LSTM, GRU, and transformer robustness to covariate shift.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- A hybrid STL-LightGBM framework with probabilistic forecasting for Influenza A incidence in the post-pandemic Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Infectious diseases present significant challenges to global healthcare systems due to their rapid spread and associated profound health implications. Early detection of unusual increases in case numbers is crucial for achieving efficient resource allocation and effective response planning. Method: Therefore, this research proposes and develops a time series predictive framework based on long short-term memory (LSTM), bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM), and gated recurrent unit (GRU) neural network models to forecast the number of COVID-19 cases in Saudi Arabia and detect any unusual increase in cases. Google Trends and time series data for search terms, including "fever," "COVID," and "cough," serve as input, enabling models to detect the temporal patterns associated with a surge in cases. The framework is specifically designed to model temporal dependencies in sequential data, allowing the identification of early signs of anomalies in COVID-19 case trends. Therefore, we propose training the models on preprocessed time series data while adjusting for time lags to improve predictive accuracy. Evaluations of performance are conducted using mean square error (MSE) and F1-score metrics. Results and discussion: The experimental results demonstrate that BiLSTM returns the highest F1-score of 0.83 for the term "COVID", while LSTM and GRU reach 0.73 and 0.77, respectively. Moreover, BiLSTM outperforms LSTM and GRU at all early time lags for the search terms "fever" and "cough". The results reveal the F1-scores for the term "fever" to be 0.77, 0.62, and 0.5 for BiLSTM, GRU, and LSTM, respectively. Whereas, the F1-scores for the search term "cough" are 0.62, 0.62, and 0.5 for BiLSTM, GRU, and LSTM, respectively. Although BiLSTM incurs higher computational costs, LSTM and GRU offer efficient alternatives to deliver rapid execution. These results highlight the effectiveness of deep learning models in instances of early anomaly detection, supporting timely healthcare interventions and advancing the development of real-time monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.