ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Early mortality prediction after severe trauma using ensemble machine learning: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in smart healthcare in emergency trauma care: from intelligent triage to prognostic prediction.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Early Risk Stratification of Severe Trauma in the Emergency Department: Integrating Clinical Scoring Systems, Dynamic Biomarkers, and Artificial Intelligence-A Narrative Review.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of trauma patients at risk of in-hospital death is essential for guiding time-critical resuscitation and operative strategies. We developed and evaluated a multi-model machine learning framework that integrates vital signs, and routine laboratory and blood-gas metrics indices obtained within 30 min of emergency department arrival to predict in-hospital mortality. This single-center retrospective study included 408 critically injured trauma patients treated at the Emergency Department of the Affiliated Kunshan Hospital of Jiangsu University (January 2020-December 2021). We implemented multiple machine learning models [logistic regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, and multilayer perceptron (MLP)], and constructed stacking and soft-voting ensembles. On the test set, single-model AUROC ranged from 0.743 to 0.927, with corresponding AUPRC spanning 0.438 to 0.904. The stacking ensemble achieved AUROC 0.9462 and AUPRC 0.8679; the voting ensemble achieved AUROC 0.9506 and AUPRC 0.8715. Permutation importance in the stacking model prioritized Injury Severity Score (ISS) (mean AUROC decrease 0.0360), base excess (BE) (0.0258), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (0.0247), and pH (0.0153). In conclusion, an ensemble machine learning approach integrating early vital signs and laboratory data provides excellent discrimination and calibration for in-hospital mortality after severe trauma, with dominant contributions from ISS, GCS, and acid-base variables. These findings support the feasibility of interpretable ensemble learning for early mortality risk stratification in severe trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.