Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487611›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Motivations, consequences, and mechanisms of workplace gossip in nursing groups: a scoping review.

Siying Wei, Yang Yang, Xun Xu, Ling Zhu, Yawen An, Wenjun Hu, Zuoyan Liu, Xiaofeng Xie

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siying WeiWest China Hospital /West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yang YangSchool of Mathematics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Xun XuDepartment of Information Systems and Operations Management, College of Business Administration and Public Policy, California State University, Carson, CA, United States.
Ling ZhuWest China Hospital /West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yawen AnWest China Hospital /West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenjun HuWest China Hospital /West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zuoyan LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaofeng XieWest China Hospital /West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Workplace gossip is a pervasive form of informal communication, with significant implications for both individual and organizational consequences. Nevertheless, it remains underexplored, particularly within the distinctive social context of nursing profession. Methods: Using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted across six databases including PubMed and Cochrane Library, retrieving 1,487 articles and examining 30 studies from 1993 to 2025. The selection of studies followed predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the extracted data were charted using a series of tables. Results: Grounded in Social Information Processing theory, this study systematically explores the motivations, consequences, and mechanisms of workplace gossip in nursing groups. The findings reveal that: (1) Workplace gossip stems from both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations, deeply shaped by social context of the nursing profession; (2) It has both beneficial and harmful effects on nurses and organizations; (3) Its mechanisms of influence are mediated by organizational and cultural factors such as perceived justice, relational networks, work environment, and group tenure diversity. Conclusion: As a complex organizational phenomenon, workplace gossip exhibits distinctive motivations, consequences, and underlying mechanisms in nursing groups. A comprehensive understanding and evidence-based guidance of gossip in nursing practice may transform it into a constructive managerial resource, fostering staff well-being, patient safety, and organizational adaptability.

Indexed as

CommunicationMotivationNursesWorkplaceHumansconsequencesmotivationsnursesscoping reviewworkplace gossip

Identifiers

PMID41487611
PMCPMC12756507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.