ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Development of a clinical diagnostic model for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma in women aged 40-60 years based on refined abnormal uterine bleeding patterns.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined Use of Aqueous Extracts and Polysaccharides from Angelica sinensis and Platycladus orientalis Treats Androgenetic Alopecia.Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a diagnostic nomogram model for predicting atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrial carcinoma (EC) in women aged 40-60 years with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), incorporating detailed bleeding patterns and clinical parameters. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1,920 patients aged 40-60 years with AUB who underwent hysteroscopic evaluation across four hospital branches from 2021 to 2024. Variables were screened via univariate logistic regression followed by LASSO regression. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed using seven selected predictors, including age, family history of cancer, endometrial thickness, menstrual blood loss, abnormal menstrual duration, intermenstrual bleeding, and postmenopausal bleeding. Internal validation was performed using bootstrap resampling; external validation was conducted using an independent cohort. Results: The final model demonstrated good discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.814 in the training cohort, 0.762 in external validation). Calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Decision curve analysis confirmed favorable clinical utility. Patients classified as high-risk (score ≥70.362) had a significantly increased likelihood of AEH/EC (OR = 12.46, 95% CI: 7.56-21.01, P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study presents a validated, user-friendly nomogram integrating refined AUB patterns and clinical variables to support early risk stratification for AEH/EC in women aged 40-60 years. The model demonstrates robust predictive performance and may assist in guiding individualized diagnostic strategies, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.