ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Preoperative predictors of unplanned conversion in laparoscopic liver resection: a multicenter cohort analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify preoperative predictors of conversion from laparoscopic to open hepatectomy for optimized patient selection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 755 patients undergoing laparoscopic liver tumor resection at two tertiary centers (December 2019-June 2025). Patients were stratified by surgical approach: laparoscopic completion (n=709) versus unplanned conversion (n=46). Univariate analysis was performed using the chi-square (χ²) test for categorical variables and the independent samples t-test for continuous variables. Variables with a p-value < 0.05 were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent risk factors for conversion. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The conversion rate was 6.09% (46/755), predominantly due to uncontrolled bleeding (43.5%) and severe adhesions (34.8%). Multivariate analysis identified five independent predictors: history of abdominal surgery (OR = 2.12, 95%CI: 1.05-4.26); liver cirrhosis (OR = 5.34, 95%CI: 1.80-15.84); postero-superior tumor location (OR = 11.36, 95%CI: 5.49-23.52); extended resection (≥3 segments, OR = 2.80, 95%CI: 1.22-6.43); and extrahepatic organ resection (OR = 4.71, 95%CI: 1.13-19.56). Notably, while larger tumor showed univariate significance (p=0.041), it was not an independent multivariate predictor. Conclusion: Critical preoperative risk factors for conversion include history of abdominal surgery, liver cirrhosis, tumors located in the postero-superior segment, extensive liver resection, and liver resection combined with extrahepatic organ resection. Careful selection of appropriate candidates for laparoscopic liver resection can help reduce the risk of conversion to laparotomy and the occurrence of further complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.