ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Methylation profiling in neuropathological tumors diagnosis: a comprehensive review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in molecular pathobiology of PCNSL - towards clinical implementation of novel diagnostics and therapeutics.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Molecular profiling of pediatric medulloblastoma in Kazakhstan: Genomic alterations, subgroup distribution, and survival.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Epigenetic Alterations in Meningiomas-A Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Brain Cancer: Molecular Alterations and Emerging Trends in Neuropharmacology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- APTw CEST MRI in therapy-naive IDH-wildtype glioblastoma: insights into tumor heterogeneity and molecular subtypes.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- The crosstalk between epigenetics and metabolism in the malignant cell.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- A MAGIBU-based model for pediatric and juvenile CNS tumors: an in-house epigenetic decision-support framework compared with online DNA methylation classifiers.Free neuropathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA methylation profiling has emerged as a transformative tool in the diagnosis and classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Traditional approaches like histology, immunohistochemistry, and targeted molecular testing cannot fully capture the biological and clinical diversity of these neoplasms. In contrast, genome-wide methylation analysis provides highly reproducible epigenetic "fingerprints" that reflect both lineage and oncogenic alterations, enabling objective tumor classification, refinement of existing categories, and discovery of novel entities. This comprehensive review summarizes the principles of DNA methylation, available platforms, and the application of methylation-based classifiers across major CNS tumor groups, including diffuse gliomas, medulloblastomas, ependymomas, and meningiomas. We highlight how methylation profiling complements other molecular techniques by simultaneously generating copy number profiles and promoter methylation data, consolidating multiple diagnostic assays into a single platform. Practical considerations such as tissue quality, bioinformatic pipelines, interpretation thresholds, and cost are addressed, as are comparisons with sequencing, RNA expression, and immunohistochemistry. Finally, we explore future directions, including nanopore-based rapid testing, liquid biopsy, and artificial intelligence, which promise to extend the reach and clinical utility of methylation profiling. Collectively, these advances are establishing DNA methylation analysis as a cornerstone of precision neuropathology, aligning diagnostic and prognostic assessment with tumor biology to improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.