Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487562›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Radiomic approach to support multidisciplinary tumor board decision-making in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Giulia Pasello, Harel Kotler, Alessandra Ferro, Luca Bergamin, Elena Scagliori, Angela Grassi, Fabio Aiolli, Mattia De Nuzzo, Marco Schiavon, Matteo Sepulcri and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Giulia PaselloMedical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Harel KotlerBreast Radiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Alessandra FerroMedical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Luca BergaminDepartment of Mathematics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Elena ScaglioriRadiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Angela GrassiClinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Fabio AiolliDepartment of Mathematics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Mattia De NuzzoMedical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Marco SchiavonThoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Matteo SepulcriRadiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Marco KrengliRadiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Valentina GuarneriMedical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Francesca CaumoBreast Radiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Gisella GennaroBreast Radiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Selecting the optimal treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is complex and typically requires multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) evaluation. This study investigated whether machine learning (ML) models trained on MTB decisions could support treatment selection by integrating clinicopathological characteristics with radiomic features from both the primary tumor and mediastinal lymph nodes (LN). Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with LA-NSCLC whose treatments had been decided by an expert MTB. Patients were categorized into three pathways: (A) upfront surgery, (B) neoadjuvant systemic treatment followed by surgery, (C) concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Baseline CT scans were segmented to extract radiomic features from primary tumors and mediastinal LNs. Two ML models were developed based on clinicopathological and radiomic data, using MTB decisions as ground truth: (1) A vs. Rest and (2) B vs. C. Performance was assessed in independent training and test cohorts using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy. Results: In the training cohort, the A vs. Rest achieved an AUC of 0.847 and accuracy of 0.795 with 13 features, while the B vs. C model reached an AUC of 0.740 and accuracy of 0.700 with 9 features. In the test cohort, results remained robust, with an AUC of 0.808 (accuracy 0.700) for A vs. Rest and an AUC of 0.754 (accuracy 0.740) for B vs. C. Conclusions: ML models combining clinicopathological and radiomic features can reproduce MTB treatment recommendations for LA-NSCLC with good accuracy. This approach may provide decision in settings with limited MTB expertise and promote more consistent treatment allocation.

Indexed as

locally advanced non-small cell lung cancerlung cancermultidisciplinary tumor boardradiomicsstage III non-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID41487562
PMCPMC12757298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.