SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Synergistic antitumor effects of
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral administration of ultrafine-grained Astragalus membranaceus enhances peripheral immunity in weaned black Xiangdong goats by upregulating the complement regulator C4bp and immunoglobulin responses.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Factors Affecting the Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that astragalus polysaccharide (APS) may enhance the efficacy of conventional cancer therapies through multiple mechanisms. However, the synergistic effects of APS have not been systematically quantified. This meta-analysis was therefore conducted to quantify these potential synergistic antitumor effects and provide preclinical evidence to inform future clinical trials. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched ten databases (including PubMed and Web of Science) for preclinical studies from inception to May 2025 using predefined inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using SYRCLE's RoB tool. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4.1, while publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and Egger's test (Stata 17.0). This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251047751). Results: Forty-one publications (44 independent studies) involving 748 animals were included. APS combination therapy was associated with significant improvements in tumor-related outcomes, including reduced tumor weight and volume, suppressed metastasis, and prolonged survival. Mechanistically, APS co-administration enhanced CD8 Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides preclinical evidence that APS may serve as an adjunctive agent to enhance the efficacy of conventional cancer therapies. However, given the low certainty of current evidence, further mechanistic studies and well-designed clinical trials are urgently warranted to establish its efficacy and therapeutic role in oncology. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO 2025 CRD420251047751 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251047751.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.