Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487480›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Building a sustainable framework for laboratory animal welfare and ethics education: challenges and reform strategies.

Jian Zhang, Lingyan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jian ZhangInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Lingyan ZhangInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China has established a relatively comprehensive laws and regulations for laboratory animal welfare and ethics (LAWE). In accordance with regulatory requirements, most institutions have set up institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) to conduct ethical reviews of laboratory animal welfare. The majority of students demonstrate a high level of awareness of LAWE. However, they often lack comprehensive knowledge of the related principles and struggle to apply them in practice. This paper identifies four core challenges for LAWE education: (1) disjointed curricula; (2) undertrained faculty; (3) weak institutional safeguards; and (4) an underdeveloped ethical culture. To address these issues, we propose a comprehensive reform framework across four dimensions: (1) developing a "Required + Integrated + Tiered" curriculum system that combines theory with practice; (2) establishing a dual-certification mechanism and continuous training for faculty to ensure both ethical and technical competence; (3) implementing a closed-loop governance model including entry thresholds, robust IACUC review, and ongoing oversight; and (4) fostering a campus-wide ethical ecosystem through rituals, peer support, and public engagement. These reforms aim to embed ethical awareness into the entire educational process, cultivate respect for life, and build a sustainable, high-quality biomedical education system rooted in both scientific rigor and humanistic values.

Indexed as

curriculum reformethical cultureethics educationinstitutional governancelaboratory animal welfare

Identifiers

PMID41487480
PMCPMC12756147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.