Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487471›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Satellite-based monitoring of forage quality in grasslands of the United Kingdom using sentinel-2 data and random forest regression.

J G N Irisarri, M A Texeira, P Harris, K G Pembleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J G N IrisarriDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States.
M A TexeiraLaboratorio de Análisis Regional y Teledetección (LART), Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
P HarrisRothamsted Research North Wyke, Okehampton, United Kingdom.
K G PembletonCentre for Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the temperate grasslands of the UK, forage quality is a key factor influencing both animal performance and environmental impact. Because forage quality strongly affects rumen fermentation, improving it can reduce enteric methane emissions and mitigate animal nutritional stress. However, large-scale monitoring of forage quality remains limited due to the reliance on destructive, labor-intensive, and costly sampling methods. Remote sensing offers a promising alternative for scalable monitoring. Methods: We explored an indicative approach combining optical remote sensing (Sentinel-2) with random forest regression (RFR) models to predict four critical forage quality attributes: crude protein (CP), water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF). Calibration and validation were performed using >9,500 georeferenced observations collected between 2020 and 2022 at the North Wyke Farm Platform in southwest UK. Forage quality was measured using near-infrared (NIR) sensors mounted on agricultural machinery across paddocks containing permanent and improved pastures. Sentinel-2 spectral predictors included visible, NIR, and red-edge bands, and model performance was evaluated using R² and RMSE metrics. Results: Model performance was strong across all four forage quality attributes, with R² values ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 and consistently low RMSE values, indicating high predictive accuracy. Red-edge and NIR wavelengths were the most influential predictors. Improved pastures generally exhibited higher forage quality-characterized by lower ADF and higher WSC concentrations-than permanent pastures. Model-predicted seasonal changes were modest, whereas spatial contrasts between paddocks were much more pronounced. Discussion: The calibrated models are suitable for forage systems with species composition and quality ranges similar to those represented in our dataset but should not be directly applied to other forage types without recalibration. Overall, this work demonstrates the potential of Sentinel-2 remote sensing combined with machine-learning approaches for tolerably accurate, large-scale forage quality monitoring. Such advancements could help improve grazing management, support nutritional planning, and contribute to efforts aimed at reducing methane emissions from livestock systems.

Indexed as

ADFcrude proteingrasslandNDFNorth Wyke farm platformsentinel-2water soluble content

Identifiers

PMID41487471
PMCPMC12758411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.