ArticleJournal of HIV/AIDS & social services2025
HIV prevention through social networks: evidence from a randomized controlled trial of a peer advocacy intervention in Kampala, Uganda.
Article in Journal of HIV/AIDS & social services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mediators of the effects of an HIV prevention advocacy training intervention on prevention advocacy among persons living with HIV in Uganda.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Diffusion of HIV Prevention Advocacy in Social Networks of Persons Living with HIV in Uganda.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial of a peer advocacy training intervention for people living with HIV (PLWH), we examined effects on advocacy targeting specific HIV protective behaviors among enrolled social network members (alters), and whether alter behaviors were predicted by advocacy receipt and tone of delivery. 210 PLWH and 599 alters enrolled and were followed over 18 months. Repeated measures logistic regressions showed that PLWH in the intervention group targeted more alters with advocacy for HIV testing, condom use, pre-exposure prophylaxis, and HIV care, compared to those in the control group. Alters targeted with HIV testing advocacy were more likely to report increased HIV testing at the subsequent assessment. Among alters with HIV-negative main partners, receipt of condom use advocacy predicted increased consistent condom use at the subsequent assessment. Advocacy training for PLWH can increase targeted HIV prevention advocacy, which then promotes HIV testing and condom use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.