ArticleGastro hep advances2026
Prevalence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Ethnic Groups in a Private Vs a Safety Net-Hospital in Southern California.
Article in Gastro hep advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is rapidly increasing in incidence and prevalence. It is more prevalent among Whites as compared to Hispanics. The reasons for this disparity remain unclear. We aimed to compare EoE Prevalence between a private facility and a safety-net hospital, the latter treating a larger proportion of foreign-born Spanish-speaking patients, and to examine differences in prevalence among Hispanics across both facilities. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of adult patients who underwent upper endoscopy for dysphagia, food impaction, or EoE at 2 medical centers. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of EoE, based on clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic criteria. Logistic regression was employed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for EoE. Results: Of 1005 patients, a higher proportion of Hispanic (73.3% versus 19.7%) and Spanish-speaking patients (64.8% versus 7.6%) received care at the safety-net hospital. Overall, 70 (7.0%) patients were diagnosed with EoE, with a higher prevalence at the private versus safety-net hospital (10.5% versus 1.9%; Conclusion: The prevalence of EoE was significantly higher among Whites than Hispanics. Among Hispanics, the prevalence of EoE was not influenced by hospital setting or primary language. These results suggest that intrinsic factors, including possible genetic influences, may contribute to the disparity in EoE prevalence between the 2 groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.