ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Endolymphatic hydrops and intracranial hypertension: a quantitative MRI analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between headache and hearing impairment in middle-aged and older adults in China health and retirement longitudinal study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Endolymphatic hydrops in patients with migraine: a correlative study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Does endolymphatic hydrops affect cochlear and vestibular nerve volumes? An MRI-based morphometric study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the prevalence and association of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging markers indicative of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in patients diagnosed with endolymphatic hydrops (EH). The objective was to elucidate potential pathophysiological links between inner ear fluid dysregulation and alterations in intracranial pressure. Methods: A total of 108 adult patients with dedicated MRI and delayed post-contrast (hydrops) sequences obtained for assessment of auditory/vestibular symptoms between 01/2020 and 06/2025 were retrospectively reviewed. EH grading, nerve volumes of the cochlear nerve, common vestibular trunk and facial nerve, IIH imaging features (e.g., Meckel's cave dilatation, optic nerve findings, venous sinus stenosis), and clinical symptoms were recorded. The prevalence and co-occurrence of EH and IIH features were statistically analyzed. Results: Vestibular EH (grade 2) was noted in 71.3% (right) and 60.2% (left) of patients and cochlear EH (grade 2) in 42.6% (left) and 34.3% (right) of patients. IIH-related imaging markers were common: bilateral Meckel's cave dilatation (60.2%), partially empty sella turcica (50.9%), bilateral optic nerve sheath dilation (57.4%), optic nerve head enhancement on delayed FLAIR sequences (67.6%), and intrinsic bilateral transverse sinus stenosis (26.9%). Statistically significant associations were identified between vestibular EH severity and optic nerve sheath dilation ( Conclusion: MRI findings demonstrate a frequent coexistence of EH and radiological biomarkers of IIH. This observation supports a potential pathophysiological association between inner ear fluid dysregulation and elevated intracranial pressure, underscoring the need for prospective studies integrating clinical outcomes with advanced MRI-based assessments of fluid dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.