Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487421›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Diagnosis through differentiation: a pilot study on improving the diagnostic efficiency of primary headaches in ICHD3.

Pengfei Zhang, Roger Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pengfei ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Roger ChengDepartment of Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: What is the minimum number of questions necessary to diagnose any given primary headache disorder? The answer to this question may provide clinicians with a more efficient approach to history taking and lead to a more concise form of ICHD3. In this project, we attempt to address this problem mathematically. Methods: We defined a headache phenotype as a collection of characteristics, variables that can take on a Boolean (true/false) value and correspond to elements of the diagnostic criteria for each headache in ICHD3. There may be multiple phenotypes that fit a given diagnosis in the ICHD3. We extracted all characteristics used to describe primary headaches up to two levels deep in the hierarchy in the ICHD3. Episodic syndromes associated with migraine-recurrent gastrointestinal disturbance, benign paroxysmal vertigo, benign paroxysmal torticollis-were excluded because these require a primary diagnosis of migraine. For each headache diagnosis, we determined its "necessary true" (NT) characteristics. We also generated a list of "necessary false" (NF) characteristics by identifying characteristics that logically contradict the NT for each given diagnosis. We then sought to algorithmically identify the smallest set of NT and NF needed to differentiate between all primary headache diagnoses. As a result, any primary ICHD3 headache phenotype can be diagnosed once both the NT and NF criteria are satisfied. We verified this by translating all the possible conditions described by the ICHD3 criteria to our phenotype encoding schema. Results: We were able to minimize the NT and NF criteria to a set of 22 and 6 characteristics, respectively, with 5 overlaps between the groups. This results in a final set of 23 unique characteristics. Though an even smaller NT set may be possible, we are limited by computational power. These characteristics can be queried by using the following questions to generate a headache phenotype: (1) duration, (2) frequency, (3) sudden/rapid onset, (4) laterality, (5) clearly remembered onset, (6) sharp contour, (7) severity, (8) relationship to sleep/awakening, (9) reversibility of aura, (10) stabbing quality, and whether the headache can be triggered by (11) sex, (12) compression, (13) traction, (14) cold, or (15) exercise. Conclusion: Fifteen questions are necessary to differentiate the primary headache disorders in ICHD3. A smaller set may be possible, but we cannot prove its existence. Using this reduced set of questions, clinicians may be able to more efficiently arrive at ICHD3 diagnoses, but further research is required.

Indexed as

computational medicineheadache classificationheadache diagnosisICHD3migraineprimary headache disorderstension-type headache

Identifiers

PMID41487421
PMCPMC12756135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.