Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487414›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2025

Addressing Uganda's mental health system gaps: an urgent call for reform.

Eric Nzirakaindi Ikoona, Lucy Namulemo, Ronald Kaluya, Rebecca Ikoona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric Nzirakaindi IkoonaNational Public Health Agency, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Lucy NamulemoFoothills Community-Based Interventions, Monticello, Kentucky, USA.
Ronald KaluyaUganda Counseling and Support Services, Kampala, Uganda.
Rebecca IkoonaMakerere University, Johns Hopkins Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uganda's mental health services are at a breaking point. Suicide ideation affects 10.6% of the population, nearly triple the global average, while Butabika National Referral Hospital, the country's only national psychiatric facility, is overcrowded, under-resourced, and unsafe. The national helpline is dominated by crisis calls about suicidal distress, and reports of abuse, forced sedation, and neglect highlight governance failures. Vulnerable groups, including HIV-positive adolescents, older adults, and women facing violence, are disproportionately underserved. Yet Uganda spends less than 1% of its health budget on mental health. Evidence from Ugandan-led innovations shows reform is both feasible and cost-effective: mobile psychotherapy reduced youth depression with over 85% engagement, and task-shifting increased depression detection by 37%. Globally, every dollar invested in treatment for depression and anxiety yields four in productivity gains, while untreated depression costs Uganda nearly US$390 million annually. Criminalisation of attempted suicide further undermines care, deterring those most in need. The path forward is clear: increase funding, decriminalize suicide, scale digital and community-based models, and strengthen data systems. Uganda does not lack evidence or solutions; it lacks political will. Without urgent reform, the human and economic toll will escalate further.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformMental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdolescentCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressionFemaleHumansMental HealthSuicidal IdeationUgandadigital psychotherapyhealth system reformmental health policysuicide preventiontask-shiftingUganda

Identifiers

PMID41487414
PMCPMC12757137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.