ArticleJHLT open2026
Prognostic impact of restrictive ventilatory defects in chronic lung allograft dysfunction without restrictive allograft syndrome-like opacities: Stratification of emerging undefined and unclassified phenotypes.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a critical factor affecting post-lung transplant prognosis. While RAS-like opacities (RLO) are established as poor prognostic indicators, prognostic stratification of non-RLO CLAD cases, including undefined and unclassified phenotypes per the 2019 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria, remains unexplored. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 241 bilateral lung transplant recipients between 2005 and 2021. CLAD was diagnosed and classified per the 2019 ISHLT criteria. Non-RLO patients were stratified by restrictive ventilatory defects for survival analysis. Diaphragmatic elevation and pleural effusion were also evaluated as potential causes of restrictive physiology and their prognostic significance. Results: Of 83 CLAD patients, 61 (73.5%) had no RLO. In multivariable Cox analysis of non-RLO patients, restrictive ventilatory defects showed a trend toward worse outcomes (Hazard ratio [HR]: 2.56, 95% CI: 0.98-6.71; Conclusions: Non-RLO CLAD patients with restrictive ventilatory defects demonstrated significantly increased cumulative incidence of death (retransplantation as a competing risk), challenging the assumption that all non-RLO cases follow a favorable BOS-like prognosis. Pleural effusion was identified as a significant independent prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.