ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2026
Quantitative assessment of light discomfort thresholds in a patient with photoallodynia treated with topical naltrexone 0.01.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Light Discomfort Thresholds in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Active versus Mild Non-Active Thyroid Eye Disease.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Photoallodynia is a rare but disabling condition in which mild non-painful light triggers pain. Novel reliable diagnostic tools and effective treatments are desirable. Case presentation: A 68-year-old female patient with dry eye owing to Sjogren syndrome reported severe photoallodynia not controlled by a wide armamentarium of topical treatments (eyelid hygiene, lubricants, corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and autologous serum). Patient symptoms were evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS). Light discomfort thresholds under different lighting conditions (continuous warm, continuous cold and flashing warm) were measured using the Lumiz 100 device (Essilor International, Paris, France). All the evaluations were performed at presentation (T0), after proparacaine test (T1), and after 1 month of therapy with naltrexone 0.01 % eye drops instilled 4 times/day (T2). At T0, VAS score was 10; light discomfort thresholds were 1.83 log10[lux] for continuous warm, 1.79 log10[lux] for continuous cold, and 1.87 log10[lux] for flashing warm. At T1, a partial improvement of symptoms was reported and VAS score decreased to 8; light sensitivity thresholds slightly increased to 2.06 log10[lux] for continuous warm, 2.02 log10[lux] for continuous cold, and 2.18 log10[lux] for flashing warm. At T2, patient experienced a clinically meaningful improvement of symptoms and VAS score decreased to 4; in parallel, light discomfort thresholds increased to 2.78 log10[lux] for continuous warm, 2.82 log10[lux] for continuous cold, and 2.66 log10[lux] for flashing warm. Conclusions: Naltrexone 0.01 % eye drops successfully controlled a severe case of photoallodynia refractory to all previous treatments. This improvement was quantitatively detected by the increase of light discomfort thresholds under all lighting conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.