ArticleInternational journal of online and biomedical engineering2023
Predicting Amyloid-β Positivity in Alzheimer's Disease: Comprehensive Analysis of Feature Selection and Machine Learning Models for Accurate Identification.
Article in International journal of online and biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To accurately identify individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD), it is crucial to develop precise tools for predicting amyloid-β (Aβ) positivity in the brain. We used data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) to analyze 1,377 human subjects. These participants were divided into five groups: cognitive normal (CN), subjective memory complaints (SMC), early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI), late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI), and confirmed AD. Each group was further divided into ten subgroups based on sex, resulting in a comprehensive analysis. The dataset was used to create and evaluate the performance of 15 machine learning (ML) models. A set of 17 potential predictors was generated by combining variables from different categories, including six demographic factors (such as age), ten measurements (such as ADAS13), and APOE4 status. Through ML-based predictive modeling, several cognitive assessment measures, including ADAS13, demonstrate significant importance in multiple ML models. The highest accuracies in the 10 subgroups were 0.875, 0.892, 0.778, 0.850, 0.771, 0.739, 0.781, 0.791, 0.879, and 0.903, respectively. The collection of ML models consists of practical and valuable risk feature scores that can significantly enhance the identification of individuals who are likely to test positive for Aβ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.