ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Coexisting traditional and biomedical healthcare systems: a mixed-methods analysis of community health workers and traditional birth attendants' contributions to perinatal health behaviors in rural India.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many rural communities, traditional and biomedical health systems operate side by side, yet the comparative roles of traditional birth attendants and community health workers in perinatal care remain poorly understood. This study examines the variations in the influence of Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) and traditional birth attendants (locally known as Dais) on maternal and newborn health behaviors in rural Bihar, India. We employed a mixed-methods design. Qualitative data included 40 focus group discussions, 50 key informant interviews, and six weeks of focused ethnographic observation of both ASHAs and Dais guided by rapid ethnography principles. Quantitative data were collected through a multi-stage cluster random survey of 1,166 recent mothers and 400 ASHAs, designed to ensure representation across Bihar's major linguistic regions. Logistic regression with backward selection (validated through sensitivity analyses and alternate specifications) estimated the influence of each provider on perinatal behaviors, with multicollinearity assessed using variance inflation factors. Findings revealed distinct temporal and functional roles: ASHAs were most active during pregnancy and labor, significantly increasing the odds of antenatal visits and institutional delivery, while Dais exerted greater influence postpartum, promoting traditional practices such as newborn massage. Synergistic effects emerged in breastfeeding initiation when both providers were involved, while conflicting guidance appeared in cord care. Families often created hybrid care models that blended biomedical recommendations with ritual practices. Overall, the coexistence of ASHAs and Dais suggests complementarity rather than simple competition, though patterns varied across settings. The study focuses on behaviors rather than health outcomes, and we acknowledge that this scope, along with ethical considerations of working with overlapping provider systems, shapes interpretation. Tailored strategies that foster respectful collaboration-such as joint training and coordinated outreach-may improve the uptake and cultural acceptability of maternal and newborn health programs in rural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.