ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2026
The Pacific Way: advancing ethical research governance in the Pacific islands.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating evidence-informed decision making for arboviral disease control in Pacific Island countries.BMC global and public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ethical research governance across Pacific island countries and areas (PICs) faces challenges from limited local capacity and disproportionate external influences. However, a shared commitment to advance and strengthen ethical oversight is increasingly emerging. In May 2025, WHO, the Pacific Community, and the Pacific Academy of Sciences convened a workshop with PIC representatives to review existing health research ethics ecosystems and define priorities for improvement. Mapping efforts revealed wide disparities: some countries have formal legal frameworks and established ethics committees, while others rely on informal processes or external approvals. Concerns were expressed about externally driven research, limited local control, inconsistent consent practices, and weak mechanisms to ensure communities benefit from research. Key priorities included developing national policies that clarify governance roles and standards, creating Pacific-wide ethical research guidelines that reflect regional values, and embedding long-term capacity building and fair benefit-sharing into research partnerships. The workshop highlighted that ethical research governance is not only a technical necessity but also central to self-determination, cultural integrity, and equity. Moving forward, progress will require sustained investment, regional collaboration, and global partners to support research led by the Pacific, for the benefit of Pacific communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.