ArticleJournal of computational and nonlinear dynamics2026
Gradient-Driven Physics Informed Neural Networks for Conduction Heat Transfer and Incompressible Laminar Flow.
Article in Journal of computational and nonlinear dynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have opened new possibilities for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding physical laws directly into the learning process. However, despite their flexibility, traditional PINNs often struggle to capture sharp gradients and intricate solution features, which limits their effectiveness in many practical problems. In this work, we have introduced Gradient-Driven Physics-Informed Neural Networks (GDPINNs) that improve the ability of traditional PINNs to resolve sharp gradients. By incorporating gradient information directly into the loss function, GDPINNs better target regions where traditional PINNs typically fail. We validated the method on steady-state and transient heat conduction problems, including a central heating source and a sinusoidal boundary condition, and found strong agreement with reference solutions. To further understand the framework's capability, we applied it to a high-gradient steady-state and transient heat conduction problem, where GDPINNs show clear advantages over traditional PINNs and align closely with reference results. We also extended GDPINNs to incompressible laminar flow in a lid-driven cavity, demonstrating its broader applicability. In these cases, GDPINNs consistently provide higher accuracy and better capture critical solution features, highlighting their potential to improve PINNs-based approaches for complex physical problems with sharp gradients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.