ReviewEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026
The rise of point-of-care ultrasound in cardiopulmonary diagnostics.
Review in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Use of Natriuretic Peptides in Critically Ill Patients: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Can FoCUS Speed Up the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Automated artificial intelligence-enabled measurement of cardiac structures on point-of-care ultrasonography: a prospective multicenter validation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has rapidly evolved from a diagnostic adjunct into an essential extension of bedside clinical reasoning in acute cardiovascular care. By providing immediate, physiologically grounded, and non-invasive information, POCUS enhances diagnostic accuracy, risk stratification, and therapeutic guidance in real time. Among its core applications, lung ultrasound enables reliable detection and monitoring of pulmonary congestion, outperforming traditional methods such as chest X-ray and physical examination. The Venous Excess Ultrasound Score offers a structured assessment of systemic venous congestion through abdominal venous Doppler patterns. The left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral serves as a reproducible surrogate of forward flow and cardiac output, while focused cardiac ultrasound provides rapid structural and functional evaluation of the heart. The reliability and prognostic value of these modalities have been supported by growing evidence across diverse clinical contexts, though standardization of training and acquisition protocols remains crucial for widespread implementation. Integration of POCUS into daily workflows-through structured, serial assessments of pulmonary, venous, and haemodynamic status-holds promise to refine decision-making, individualize treatment strategies, and improve outcomes. This review summarizes current evidence, methodological considerations, and practical implications of POCUS in acute cardiovascular medicine, emphasizing its complementarity to, rather than replacement of, traditional diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.