Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487040›Full record

SynthesisAnaesthesia2026

Opioid-free vs. opioid-inclusive anaesthesia with or without regional anaesthesia for postoperative pain: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Clístenes C de Carvalho, Kariem El-Boghdadly, Idrys H L Guedes, Maria Vitória M Dantas, Danusa P B Tomé, Isabella B Ramos, Clarissa S H Gomes, Guilherme K P A Alves, Arthur P Bezerra, Jayme M Santos Neto and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Clístenes C de CarvalhoDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6482-5453
Kariem El-BoghdadlyDepartment of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Idrys H L GuedesCentre for Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Maria Vitória M DantasCentre for Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Danusa P B ToméCentre for Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Isabella B RamosCentre for Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Clarissa S H GomesCentre for Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Guilherme K P A AlvesCentre for Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Arthur P BezerraHospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Jayme M Santos NetoHospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Jaideep J PanditNuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Leandro G BrazDepartment of Surgical Specialties and Anaesthesiology, São Paulo State University, Medical School, Botucatu, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConcerns about opioid-related adverse effects have increased interest in opioid-free anaesthesia, but the benefits compared with opioid-inclusive techniques, especially in the presence of regional anaesthesia, remain uncertain.

methodsWe undertook a systematic review with a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing six strategies in adults: opioid-free anaesthesia and opioid-inclusive anaesthesia using remifentanil alone or other opioids, each with or without regional anaesthesia. Primary outcome was postoperative pain. Secondary outcomes were: postoperative opioid use; post-anaesthesia care unit discharge time; hospital duration of stay; and incidence of complications.

resultsWe included 885 trials from 59 countries. Techniques incorporating regional anaesthesia consistently ranked highest for postoperative pain. Regional anaesthesia combined with an opioid-free intra-operative strategy achieved some of the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve values for pain at 2 h, 12 h and 48 h (93%, 85% and 75%, all low certainty). When regional anaesthesia was used, differences between opioid-free and opioid-inclusive techniques were minimal (moderate certainty). For opioid consumption, regional anaesthesia with an opioid-free strategy ranked best at 2 h (moderate certainty), 12 h (low certainty) and 48 h (low certainty), with surface under the cumulative ranking curve values > 98%. Techniques without regional anaesthesia were associated with higher pain scores and greater opioid requirements. Opioid-free approaches, especially when combined with regional techniques, were associated with lower rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting. DISCUSSION: Regional anaesthesia was the key determinant of improved postoperative pain control, and intra-operative opioids added little additional benefit when regional techniques provided adequate coverage. Without regional anaesthesia, neither opioid-free nor opioid-inclusive strategies showed consistent analgesic superiority. However, opioid-free techniques reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting. These findings support preferential use of regional anaesthesia where feasible and suggest that avoiding intra-operative opioids may facilitate recovery, particularly when regional techniques are employed effectively.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, ConductionPostoperative PainHumansNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, Opioidanalgesiaopioid‐free anaesthesiapostoperative painregional anaesthesiasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41487040
PMCPMC13065899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.