ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Physiological responses to short-term high-altitude acclimatization: Insights from predictive modeling approaches.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physiological responses to short-term high-altitude acclimatization: Insights from predictive modeling approaches.Physiological reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-altitude (HA) exposure induces cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic adjustments that often impair exercise performance. These physiological responses depend on hypoxic severity, exposure duration, and individual susceptibility. Although full acclimatization generally requires about 7 days, early adaptations can emerge within the first 72 h. This study aimed to characterize these early responses and to evaluate the potential of mathematical modeling to predict HA-related exercise performance decline. Nine healthy volunteers (age: 24.4 ± 3.3; weight: 63.7 ± 11.8; height: 169.4 ± 8.4; female: 44%) completed maximal cardiopulmonary exercise tests under three conditions: at sea level (SL), and at 3015 m after 12 h (HA12h) and 60 h (HA60h) of exposure. Although 60 h at HA was insufficient for full acclimatization, significant differences were observed between HA12h and HA60h, indicating partial physiological adaptation. Maximal power output declined at both HA time points. Notably, HA-induced performance deterioration was accurately predicted (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.