Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41486942›Full record

ArticleSoft matter2026

Differential crosslinking and contractile motors drive nuclear chromatin compaction.

Ligesh Theeyancheri, Edward J Banigan, J M Schwarz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Soft matter, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ligesh TheeyancheriPhysics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. ligeshbhaskar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7973-4194
Edward J BaniganInstitute of Medical Engineering & Science and Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. ebanigan@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-7425
J M SchwarzPhysics Department, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. ligeshbhaskar@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During interphase, the cell nucleus exhibits spatial compartmentalization between transcriptionally active euchromatin and transcriptionally repressed heterochromatin. In conventional nuclear organization, euchromatin is enriched in the nuclear interior, while heterochromatin - approximately 50% denser - resides near the periphery. The nuclear lamina, a deformable structural shell, further modulates peripheral chromatin organization. Here, we investigate a chromatin model in which an active, crosslinked polymer is tethered to a deformable lamina shell. We show that contractile motor activity, shell deformability, and the spatial distribution of crosslinks jointly determine compartmentalization. Specifically, a radial crosslink density gradient, even with a small increase toward the periphery, coupled with motor activity, drives genomic segregation consistent with experimental observations. This effect arises as motors preferentially draw crosslinks toward the periphery, forming dense domains that promote heterochromatin formation. Our model also predicts increased stiffness of nuclear wrinkles due to heterochromatin compaction beneath the lamina, consistent with instantaneous stiffening observed under nanoindentation. We conclude by outlining potential experimental approaches to validate our model predictions.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusChromatinHeterochromatinNuclear LaminaChromatinHeterochromatin

Identifiers

PMID41486942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.