ArticleJournal of Yeungnam medical science2026
Qualitative exploration of manual dental records in the digital era using sociotechnical systems theory: insight from a teaching dental institution.
Article in Journal of Yeungnam medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental records are essential repositories of patient information that support diagnosis, treatment planning, continuity of care, and medicolegal accountability, making them a fundamental component of safe, effective, and transparent dental practices. This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of academic and nonacademic clinical staff regarding a paper-based patient record system at a Malaysian public dental institute.
methodsA qualitative phenomenological design underpinned by the sociotechnical systems theory was employed. Purposive sampling recruited 20 full-time staff (10 academic, 10 nonacademic) with at least 1 year of experience using the manual record system and no prior training in electronic dental records. Semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted between May 2025 and October 2025, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Rigor was enhanced through independent coding, member checking, reflexive journaling, and adherence to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
resultsFour main themes were identified: (1) inefficiency and accessibility challenges; (2) accuracy, legibility, and record integrity; (3) continuity of care and patient safety risks; and (4) desire for digital transition and system improvements.
conclusionAlthough manual paper-based dental records remain central to documentation in teaching dental institutions, they present growing inefficiencies and safety concerns, highlighting the need for sociotechnical-informed strategies that align human processes, technology, and institutional support to enhance recordkeeping and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.