ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Curvy Surface Reconstruction.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Curvy Surface Reconstruction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The physical world around us is inherently curvy, dynamic, and variable, yet modern industrial civilization is grounded in the planar, rigid paradigms of science and technology. This fundamental disconnect between two-dimensional (2D) techniques and three-dimensional (3D) realities significantly restricts our ability to fully perceive and to understand the complexity of real-world objects. Over the past several decades, driven by application demands across various industries, advancements in high-speed, high-accuracy, and high-resolution sensors, as well as ever-increasing AI algorithms and computational power, curvy surface reconstruction that can reconstruct continuous, smooth geometrical and physical fields from discrete data by algorithms and mathematics have experienced tremendous developments. However, previous reviews in this field have primarily focused on geometric shapes, optical measurement techniques, or reconstruction algorithms, leaving a comprehensive overview that integrates both geometric and physical dimensions still lacking. Here, for the first time, we bridge this gap by expanding the scope from special curvy imaging to general curvy reconstruction incorporating physical fields, with a particular emphasis on measurement techniques, especially the emerging opportunities from advanced techniques. Initially, a brief overview starts with introducing the theoretical underpinnings and primary issues of curvy surface reconstruction. Next, an in-depth discussion of the main non-contact and contact measurement methods is presented, detailing their operational principles, progress, merits and demerits, and future efforts. Following that, several reconstruction algorithms and their applications are discussed. Finally, our insights on the ongoing challenges and opportunities in this field are summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.