ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
Convex Hartree-Fock theory for modeling ground state conical intersections.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate modeling of conical intersections is crucial in nonadiabatic molecular dynamics, as these features govern processes such as radiationless transitions and photochemical reactions. Conventional electronic structure methods, including Hartree-Fock, density functional theory, and their time-dependent extensions, struggle in this regime. Due to their single reference nature and separate treatment of ground and excited states, they fail to capture ground state intersections. Multiconfigurational approaches overcome these limitations, but at a prohibitive computational cost. In this work, we propose a modified Hartree-Fock framework, referred to as Convex Hartree-Fock, that optimizes the reference within a tailored subspace by removing projections along selected Hessian eigenvectors. The ground and excited states are then obtained through subsequent Hamiltonian diagonalization. We validate the approach across several test cases and benchmark its performance against time-dependent Hartree-Fock within the Tamm-Dancoff approximation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.