Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41486397›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2026

Opportunities and challenges of targeting cGAS-STING in cancer.

Changzheng Lu, Wenyan Wang, Yang-Xin Fu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Regulation of Innate Immune Signaling by Autophagy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Changzheng Lu *Institute of Cancer Research, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen, China. changzheng.lu@szbl.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0904-0303
Wenyan Wang *School of Basic Medical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7663-9124
Yang-Xin FuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. yangxinfu@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-6617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase (cGAS)-stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway has a crucial role in detecting tumour-derived DNA, whether the pathway is generated spontaneously or induced therapeutically. Activation of the cGAS-STING pathway triggers type I interferon signalling and pro-inflammatory responses in both tumour and immune cells, establishing a delicate balance between pathological inflammation and protective immune responses. Although preclinical studies have highlighted the promise of targeting the cGAS-STING pathway to enhance antitumour immunotherapy, clinical results have fallen short of expectations. In this Review, we outline key advances in understanding the tumour-promoting and tumour-suppressive effects mediated by the cGAS-STING pathway and discuss opportunities and challenges for its integration into future cancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsNeoplasmsNucleotidyltransferasesAnimalsCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseHumansImmunotherapyInterferon Type IMolecular Targeted TherapySignal TransductionSTING ProteincGAS protein, humanCyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate SynthaseInterferon Type IMembrane ProteinsNucleotidyltransferasesSTING1 protein, humanSTING Protein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.