Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41486375›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2026

Hydrus microstent versus triple iStent inject W combined with phacoemulsification for glaucoma management: three-year outcomes.

Graham A Lee, Shenouda Girgis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Graham A LeeBrisbane North Eye Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. g.lee1@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9359-1473
Shenouda GirgisBrisbane North Eye Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hydrus Microstent (HM) and iStent inject W are two widely used trans-trabecular bypass devices and can be combined with phacoemulsification for glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery.

aimTo compare the efficacy and safety of the HM with triple iStent inject W devices (TiSW) devices combined with phacoemulsification in a real-world setting over 3 years of follow-up.

methodsA prospective, consecutive, quasi-experimental, longitudinal study was conducted on open-angle glaucoma patients at a subspecialty cataract and glaucoma private practice in Brisbane, Australia. Outcomes included yearly changes from preoperative values in mean IOP and mean number of glaucoma medications; proportional shifts across IOP and number of glaucoma medication categories at preoperative and yearly time points, and hazard ratio for time to failure based on the American Academy of Ophthalmology combined minimally invasive glaucoma surgery criteria. Multi-level mixed effects regression modelling with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to estimate the treatment effect while accounting for repeated measurements, clustering, confounding, and imbalances in baseline covariates.

resultsOf the 105 cases, 56 (53.3%) phacoemulsification cases were combined with the HM and 49 (46.7%) were combined with the TiSW. At 3 years, the mean IOP reduction in the HM was 2.6 mmHg (from 15.1 to 12.5 mmHg), while the TiSW showed a reduction of 2.0 mmHg (from 15.2 to 13.2 mmHg). No significant between-group differences in estimated changes in mean IOP from preoperative values were found at years 1, 2, and 3 (all Holm adjusted p = 1.00). Significant reductions in the estimated mean number of medications were observed in both groups at 3 years. The changes in mean number of medications from preoperative values at yearly timepoints were not statistically significant between groups (all Holm adjusted p = 1.00). The 3-year reduction was 1.3 medications in the HM (from a total of 2.3 to 1.0) and 1.4 medications in the TiSW (from a total of 2.2 to 0.8), resulting in a difference of 0.1 (95% CI: -0.6, 0.8). The proportions of eyes that were medication-free at 3 years were 54.3% in the HM group and 61.2% in the TiSW group. The intraoperative safety of the HM and TiSW was good, with no significant complications.

conclusionThis study has shown that both HM and TiSW provide effective IOP reduction and medication reduction in glaucoma patients undergoing combined cataract surgery at up to 3 years follow-up. Both devices were well-tolerated. Surgeon preference may guide device selection, with specific considerations for patients such as extremes of ocular size or anticoagulation therapy.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AnglePhacoemulsificationStentsAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID41486375
PMCPMC12957381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.