ArticleScientific reports2026
Research on AGV based on improved A-star algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) are crucial for enhancing efficiency in logistics automation. To address path planning inefficiencies in complex warehouse environments, an improved A-star algorithm is proposed. A three-neighborhood search strategy is introduced, incorporating obstacle detection and dynamic direction adjustment to eliminate redundant node traversal. Additionally, an optimized evaluation function is developed by integrating a predictive cost weighting coefficient based on OPEN list. Comparative simulations on large-scale maps with varying obstacle densities demonstrate the algorithm's superiority and robustness. Results indicate that compared to Dijkstra and traditional A-star, the proposed method reduces search node traversal by up to 95.9% and 37.6%, respectively, and computation time by 94.8% while maintaining optimal path length. The algorithm exhibits consistent performance advantages across different environmental complexities, validating its scalability and reliability for real-time logistics applications. Furthermore, comparative analysis with state-of-the-art planners (e.g., JPS, Theta*) highlights its practical advantage of balancing high performance with implementation simplicity within the standard A-star framework, ensuring easy integration for real-world AGV systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.