ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2026
Artificial intelligence-based machine learning models for preoperative diagnosis and staging of ovarian tumors.
Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in ovarian pathophysiology and management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOvarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, necessitating precise diagnostic strategies to improve patient outcomes. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models that utilize patient history, imaging, and blood test data to differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian tumors and predict the stage of malignant cases.
methodsA total of 357 individuals diagnosed with ovarian tumors participated in the study. Among these, 139 tumors were identified as benign, 40 as borderline, and 178 as malignant. The analysis employed four machine learning classifiers support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and decision tree utilizing 39 features derived from blood tests, imaging, and the patient's background to generate diagnostic outcomes. The study focused on assessing the significance of these features in predicting malignancy and determining the stage of the disease.
resultsThe RF algorithm demonstrated the highest accuracy, reaching 94% based on imaging and tumor markers, with an AUC of 0.9. Key features contributing to this success include Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) and Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125). In terms of staging malignant tumors, the SVM exhibited lower error rates, particularly in predicting advanced-stage disease (AUC: 0.77). Notably, CA125 and the presence of ascites emerged as the most influential factors for accurately staging the disease.
conclusionThe utilization of AI models proves effective in accurately classifying both malignant and benign ovarian tumors, showcasing promising advancements in diagnostic capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.