Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41486333›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute2026

Artificial intelligence-based machine learning models for preoperative diagnosis and staging of ovarian tumors.

Soheila Aminimoghaddam, Hamid Mokhtari Torshizi, Roghayeh Pourali, Arash Mohazzab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Soheila Aminimoghaddam *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Karimkhan Zand Boulevard, Behafarin St, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid Mokhtari Torshizi *Biomedical Engineering and Physics Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Roghayeh PouraliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Karimkhan Zand Boulevard, Behafarin St, Tehran, Iran. Roghayehpourali@ymail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7614-0518
Arash MohazzabDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

Iran University of Medical Sciences Iran University of Medical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy, necessitating precise diagnostic strategies to improve patient outcomes. This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models that utilize patient history, imaging, and blood test data to differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian tumors and predict the stage of malignant cases.

methodsA total of 357 individuals diagnosed with ovarian tumors participated in the study. Among these, 139 tumors were identified as benign, 40 as borderline, and 178 as malignant. The analysis employed four machine learning classifiers support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and decision tree utilizing 39 features derived from blood tests, imaging, and the patient's background to generate diagnostic outcomes. The study focused on assessing the significance of these features in predicting malignancy and determining the stage of the disease.

resultsThe RF algorithm demonstrated the highest accuracy, reaching 94% based on imaging and tumor markers, with an AUC of 0.9. Key features contributing to this success include Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) and Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125). In terms of staging malignant tumors, the SVM exhibited lower error rates, particularly in predicting advanced-stage disease (AUC: 0.77). Notably, CA125 and the presence of ascites emerged as the most influential factors for accurately staging the disease.

conclusionThe utilization of AI models proves effective in accurately classifying both malignant and benign ovarian tumors, showcasing promising advancements in diagnostic capabilities.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingROC CurveSupport Vector MachineWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2Young AdultBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2WFDC2 protein, humanArtificial intelligenceMachine learningOvarian cancerOvarian mass

Identifiers

PMID41486333
PMCPMC13313448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.