ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
A visual exploration of the evolutionary trajectory in robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignancies.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robotic surgery has emerged as a key minimally invasive approach for gastrointestinal malignancies, stimulating substantial global research activity. This study employed bibliometric and visual methods to map the knowledge structure, evolutionary trajectory, research hotspots, and emerging trends in this field. We systematically retrieved relevant publications in this field from the Web of Science Core Collection over the past decade and conducted a visualization analysis. The findings delineate four major research hotspots in this field, including comparative effectiveness research against laparoscopy, technical refinement and standardization, perioperative outcome optimization, and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning. The field's focus has evolved from initial feasibility studies toward recent investigations involving AI, deep learning, risk prediction, enhanced recovery after surgery, and multidisciplinary integration. The comprehensive integration of AI and deep learning, particularly through predictive modeling and intraoperative navigation, represents a key direction for future research. This study provides valuable guidance and insights for shaping future research agendas and refining clinical practice in this rapidly advancing field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41486325What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.