ArticleLasers in medical science2026
Dual-modality approach with 675 nm laser and microfocused ultrasound for facial aging: retrospective evaluation.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous aging is characterized by gradual structural and functional alterations, including collagen breakdown and reduced elasticity. In recent years, several energy-based modalities have been introduced to address these changes. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a 675 nm laser and microfocused ultrasound (MFU), applied individually or in combination, for the treatment of facial aging. This retrospective analysis included 115 patients, allocated into three groups: Group A (675 nm laser), Group B (MFU), and Group C (combined protocol). Efficacy was evaluated through the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale (FWS), the Baker Gravitational Ptosis Classification (BGP), and standardized photographic assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months following treatment. At the 6-month evaluation, individuals treated with the combined protocol exhibited a more pronounced improvement in wrinkle reduction (FWS: from 1.88 to 1.13) and laxity reduction (BGP: from 2.78 to 1.55) compared with either single-treatment group. No major side effects were observed. The combined application of the 675 nm laser and MFU appears to potentiate collagen remodeling and skin tightening more effectively than monotherapy. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and further clarify the molecular pathways involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.