ArticleEcho research and practice2026
Assessment of chronic aortic regurgitation using end-diastolic flow reversal in the upper descending aorta: diagnostic accuracy and prediction of aortic valve surgery in a prospective echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study.
Article in Echo research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess the utility of end-diastolic flow reversal in the upper descending aorta (EFR) for echocardiographic grading of aortic regurgitation (AR) severity, using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) as the reference. Additionally, we evaluated the role of EFR in predicting the need for aortic valve (AV) surgery during mid-term follow-up.
methodsSixty-six patients (mean age 53 ± 15.0 years, 73% men) underwent echocardiographic assessment, including (semi-)quantitative parameters such as proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA), effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA), AR volume (AR-Vol), vena contracta (VC) and EFR, compared against CMR-derived regurgitant fraction (RF). Multivariable regression analysis was applied evaluating predictors for severe AR and AV surgery.
resultsAccording to CMRI, 13 patients had no, 16 mild, 18 moderate and 19 severe AR. All echocardiographic parameters demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy (AUC: EFR 0.84, VC 0.82, PISA 0.84, EROA 0.83, AR-Vol 0.86; all p < 0.001). Logistic regression identified EFR (p = 0.022) and VC (p = 0. 015) as significant predictors of severe AR. During 62 months follow-up, 16 of 53 patients (24%) underwent AV surgery. All echocardiographic parameters, except PHT, were significantly different between patients receiving AV surgery compared to patients without surgery (PISA, EROA, AR-Vol and VC p < 0.001, EFR p = 0.043). However, VC remained the only parameter significantly associated with time to AV surgery (Cox-regression analysis, p = 0.024).
conclusionsEFR is a robust and reliable parameter for AR assessment, particularly in distinguishing moderate from severe AR, and should be incorporated into comprehensive echocardiographic assessment. However, VC demonstrated stronger prognostic relevance for predicting surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.