Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41486210›Full record

ReviewNano-micro letters2026

Interface Engineering Strategies for Shuttle Mitigation in Alkali Metal-Sulfur Batteries: A Comparative Review from Li-S to Na-S and K-S Systems.

Zihan Chen, Qiyao Yu, Wei Wang, Jianguo Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nano-micro letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zihan ChenSchool of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
Qiyao YuSchool of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China. qiyaoyu@bit.edu.cn.
Wei WangSchool of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Beijing, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China.
Jianguo ZhangSchool of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China. zjgbit@bit.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rechargeable alkali metal-sulfur (M-S) batteries, including Li/Na/K-S chemistries, have the potential to utilize abundant and low-cost sulfur cathodes yet offer high theoretical energy densities. However, their practical electrochemical performance is fundamentally limited by the polysulfide shuttle effect. This challenge is particularly exacerbated in Na-S and K-S systems owing to larger metal-ion radii, weaker solvation energies, slower redox kinetics, and greater electrolyte-electrode incompatibilities compared to Li-S batteries. This review presents a comparative analysis of interface engineering strategies designed to suppress the shuttle effect across these three systems. Following a summary of sulfur cathode properties and reaction mechanisms, we systematically examine the origins of polysulfide shuttling. Our analysis progresses from functional separator design and interlayer enhancements to the implementation of solid‑state electrolytes for root-cause inhibition. By evaluating interface engineering research specific to Na-S and K-S batteries, we elucidate both shared principles and unique challenges inherent to alkali M-S systems. Finally, we propose multifaceted solutions to achieve shuttle-free operation and enhance overall battery performance, thereby establishing a foundation for future advancements.

Indexed as

Alkali metal–sulfur batteryCommon and inherent differencesInterface engineeringShuttle mitigation

Identifiers

PMID41486210
PMCPMC12765804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.